Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Protecting 3rd Ranking

UCLA in 2008 was ranked third in the nation for a medical center - behind John Hopkins in Maryland and The Mayo Clinic in Minnasota, so when I filed my complaint with both the Medical Board of California - who is responsible for a doctor's license, and Medicare - who can take away the priviledge to receive funds for any and all medical treatment for citizens over 65, the doctors involved with my treatment and UCLA alledgedly went into action to protect that ranking by making sure my complaint would never be heard in California, but rather Florida. No one expected me to question my medical treatment and that I had a "very rare cancer" ... the absolute arrogance of the doctor involved to think he was above the truth and I would buy whatever lie he told me!

What is very disturbing about this situation now, is that there are so many poeple involved with this alledged conspiracy. Last year in 2009, according to the Los Angeles Times and 60 Minutes on CBS, UCLA sold liver transplants to "Japanese Mob Bosses" for $1,000,000.00 for one man, and $400,000.00 for 3 others, making a total of $2,200,000.00. It didn't involve Medicare and the federal government so they got away with the excuse they gave as several men died waiting for a liver transplant who were high on the list and the Japanese Mob Bosses were low down on the list, but had millions to pay for one. How much has been paid to cover up the fraud involved in my case?

Thursday, March 11, 2010

INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT

Well here I am again, and with new information. It appears that this whole situation is a massive conspiracy and cover-up from day one, when I filed my complaint with Medicare for abuse, and later realizing fraud.

I have just learned that medical records are supposed to be reviewed by physician peer reviewers - licensed and in practice in California. That is what it is "supposed to be", but what it was, in fact, was that no one in California connected with Medicare knew of my complaint and the circumstances which I brought to light, because all of the records that were sent by doctors and by UCLA were sent to Florida for review - after the contract was taken from California just after I filed my complaint. The records were then given to a new HSAG office in Florida.

I allege that all of the records that were supposed to be sent to a physicians peer review were in fact sent to either the owner or an employee of the owner of the HSAG corporate office in Arizona to "review" and make a recommendation, and not from California as I allege they were contracted to do... It was intentional concealment of the facts of my case, and the goal was to let all physicians and UCLA off the hook by saying "it met the standard of care" and therefore my file was closed. Only when I wrote the Secretary of Health and Human Services in Washington D.C., was my case re-opened.

And that is the status now.