Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Fourth Anniversary of Fraud

May 28th marks the 4th year since my unlawful surgery at UCLA and I am thankful to the Los Angeles Times and their front page article on May 27th, "Patients Save by Paying Cash."   I now believe the motivation for my surgery was MONEY.  I believe a woman who I knew (I call her the "Vulture") was the reason behind my surgery... she is the one who has cancer (starting with breast cancer in 1986) and needed medical treatments, including surgery and chemotherapy, but could not use her real name because she is a criminal and wanted in other states. So she used my name as Janet Winston with December 14th birthday and not my legal name of Janet H. Winston with December 17th birthday.  She had the cash to pay thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars for her medical treatments and did not have to prove who she was because no insurance was involved.  And I believe she paid Dorigo and Elizabeth Wager big time, and the reason Dr. Wager fled UCLA when I exposed her for meeting with me in secret (in an office she had no reason to be in) was to get an idea of who I was and to give Dr. Dorigo her opinion of me. Elizabeth Wager was the head of pathology.

All the people that were present int he operating room on May 28, 2008 should be investigated, especially since one of the doctors in there said in their medical report "we took her back to the operating room" ... they didn't take me, they exchanged me for the vulture.  There were two different anesthesia's administered and billed to Medicare because there were two different women.  I was the "rehearsal" and she was the "main event".   I then had two trips to the E.R. within 12 days after my surgery.

It started on April 1, 2008 with a CT scan (at a cost of $6,400 for Medicare but not included in the 8 hospitals the Times named) and it showed I had no cancer.  But after I got home, Dorigo's office called to make sure I was there and not still at UCLA, so they could do another CT scan (20 minutes AFTER I was home). During that call, I was told I had a "very rare cancer".   The California Hospital Association says that "discounted cash prices are intended for the uninsured and not for those who have coverage".  I was a front for this horrible woman, even though I could have died. No one cared about that... only the money.  This is like the story both the Times and CBS did on Japanese mob bosses who paid $2,200,000.00 for 4 men to have liver transplants at UCLA instead of men who were on the list before them, and as a result, died.  It appears UCLA is very agreeable to criminals who pay in cash.. and therefore, their license should be pulled.